Scientific Drilling
Scientific Drilling
SD
Articles | Volume 22
Articles | Volume 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-22-35-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-22-35-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 22
Technical development
 | 
31 May 2017
Technical development |  | 31 May 2017

A comparison of the use of X-ray and neutron tomographic core scanning techniques for drilling projects: insights from scanning core recovered during the Alpine Fault Deep Fault Drilling Project

Jack N. Williams, Joseph J. Bevitt, and Virginia G. Toy

Viewed

Total article views: 1,968 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
916 927 125 1,968 119 164
  • HTML: 916
  • PDF: 927
  • XML: 125
  • Total: 1,968
  • BibTeX: 119
  • EndNote: 164
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 May 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 May 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,714 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,705 with geography defined and 9 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 15 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
We compare images of drillcore from the Alpine Fault in New Zealand that were collected using X-ray computed tomography (CT) and neutron tomography (NT). Both techniques provide 3-D images of the core's internal structure, which would not be possible through visual analysis alone. We find that CT scans are more beneficial, as they can image a wider range of rock types, and this scanning technique is more practical. Nevertheless, NT provides complementary scans over limited intervals of core.
Read more